Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
How Independence Realty Trust, Inc. stacks up
IRT · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #402 of 663 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.2% vs peer median 5.3%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.3% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 1.2% | 5.3% | 27% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 6.3% | 5.3% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 3.3% | 6.8% | 27% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 96.4% | 112.8% | 41% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IRT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 402 | 4.9B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 39 | 54 | |
| 402 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score