Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima
How IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima stacks up
IRS · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #58 of 663 · scores higher than 91% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including IRS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.4% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 90% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.1% vs peer median 5.4%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Earnings yield: 26.5% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IRS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IRS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 26.5% | 5.3% | 96% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 13.1% | 5.3% | 90% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 9.4% | 6.8% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 151.8% | 112.8% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IRS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 58 | 1.9B CNY (≈$270M) | 91 | 88 | |
| 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score