Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Iron Mountain Incorporated
How Iron Mountain Incorporated stacks up
IRM · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Profitability
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #332 of 760 · scores higher than 56% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including IRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 18.8% vs peer median 26.8%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.0% vs peer median 2.1%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 83% of peers. Return on invested capital: 7.1% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IRM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | 7.1% | 3.4% | 83% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | 18.8% | 26.8% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 2.0% | 2.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | Not reported | 5.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 54.2% | 53.9% | 51% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IRMScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score