Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IPSC · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #469 of 1,373 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 66
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including IPSC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IPSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.17× | 0.24× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.67 | 0.53 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 8.28× | 2.62× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 465 | 9.3B AUD (≈$6.1B) | 66 | 55 | |
| 466 | 1.03T JPY (≈$7.0B) | 66 | 68 | |
| 467 | 4.3B CNY (≈$596M) | 66 | 56 | |
| 468 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 66 | 76 | |
| 469 | 275M USD | 66 | 46 | |
| 470 | 4.4B CNY (≈$613M) | 66 | 43 | |
| 471 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 66 | 53 | |
| 472 | 218M USD | 66 | 53 | |
| 473 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 66 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score