Ranked #395 of 399 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 0
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
40 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including IPEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 0 among Financial Services companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
▼Shareholders' equity is negative, so debt/equity counts as among the highest in its peer group. Debt / equity: — vs peer median 0.57×
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 99% of peers. Current ratio: 0.05× vs peer median 2.02×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IPEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
IPEX
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported
Not reported
0.57×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 394 reported
Not reported
0.67
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported
0.05×
2.04×
1%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
Housing and Urban Development Corporation LimitedHUDCO.NS · India
