Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Intuit Inc.
How Intuit Inc. stacks up
INTU · against 51 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
77/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 52 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including INTU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 77?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.4% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INTU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INTU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 53 reported | 4.8% | 2.7% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | 7.3% | 4.7% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 9.4% | 3.1% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 20.5% | 12.2% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INTU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95.8B USD | 89 | 67 | |
| 2 | 3.46T TWD (≈$107.1B) | 81 | 58 | |
| 2 | 155.8B USD | 81 | 63 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 81 | 89 | |
| 5 | 92.1B USD | 77 | 68 | |
| 5 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 77 | 74 | |
| 7 | 832.5B CNY (≈$116.5B) | 76 | 65 | |
| 7 | 22.73T JPY (≈$154.5B) | 76 | 62 | |
| 9 | 136.0B USD | 75 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score