Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Intel Corporation
How Intel Corporation stacks up
INTC · against 24 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
39/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #24 of 25 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including INTC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.3% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 8.5%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = INTC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | INTC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 7.5% | 21.6% | 4% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 22 reported | Not reported | 36.7% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | -3.3% | 10.1% | 0% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around INTC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 421.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 3 | 25.82T JPY (≈$175.6B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 4 | 207.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 4 | 259.7B USD | 95 | 63 | |
| 20 | 303.1B USD | 57 | 58 | |
| 20 | 406.0B USD | 57 | 54 | |
| 22 | 285.4B USD | 55 | 63 | |
| 23 | 5.87T TWD (≈$182.0B) | 44 | 46 | |
| 24 | 320.1B USD | 39 | 28 | |
| 25 | 175.6B USD | 32 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score