Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMVT · against 222 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #36 of 223 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including IMVT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMVT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 215 reported | Not reported | 0.25× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 223 reported | 0.81 | 0.55 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 214 reported | 7.27× | 2.72× | 81% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 100 | |
| 32 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 87 | ||
| 33 | 3.4B USD | 86 | 35 | |
| 34 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 86 | 65 | |
| 35 | 5.1B USD | 85 | 35 | |
| 36 | 6.0B USD | 84 | ||
| 37 | 3.1B USD | 84 | 27 | |
| 38 | 21.6B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 83 | 70 | |
| 39 | 49.0B CNY (≈$6.9B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 40 | 4.7B USD | 82 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score