Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HTFL · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #246 of 1,373 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 82
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including HTFL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HTFL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.10× | 0.24× | 67% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | Not reported | 0.53 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 5.08× | 2.62× | 74% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 242 | 49.0B CNY (≈$6.9B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 243 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.0B CNY (≈$278M) |
| 82 |
| 46 |
| 244 | 178.5B KRW (≈$129M) | 82 | 76 |
| 245 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 82 | 67 |
| 246 | 4.7B USD | 82 | 46 |
| 247 | 22.8B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 82 | 60 |
| 248 | 2.67T INR (≈$32.1B) | 82 | 68 |
| 249 | 1.6B CNY (≈$223M) | 82 | 46 |
| 250 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 82 | 73 |