Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
How ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. stacks up
IMOS · against 470 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #295 of 471 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IMOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, which is weaker than most Technology peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 87% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IMOS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IMOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 3.9% | 2.4% | 69% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 475 reported | 11.9% | 4.6% | 86% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 175 reported | 1.3% | 3.2% | 32% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 41.5% | 32.3% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IMOS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 290 | 21.8B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 39 | 39 | |
| 295 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 38 | 33 | |
| 295 | 1.4B USD | 38 | 39 | |
| 295 | 3.0B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 295 | 1.8B USD | 38 | 30 | |
| 295 | 3.2B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 295 | 2.0B USD | 38 | 58 | |
| 301 | 4.20T KRW (≈$3.0B) | 37 | 29 | |
| 301 | 116.2B TWD (≈$3.6B) | 37 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score