Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMNM · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #169 of 1,373 · scores higher than 88% of peers · safety percentile 88
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including IMNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.01× | 0.24× | 90% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 2.56 | 0.53 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 15.08× | 2.62× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 165 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 88 | 84 | |
| 166 | 337M USD | 88 | 33 | |
| 167 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 88 | 34 | |
| 168 | 13.0B TWD (≈$402M) | 88 | 49 | |
| 169 | 2.4B USD | 88 | 27 | |
| 170 | 110M USD | 88 | 54 | |
| 171 | 5.4B CNY (≈$751M) | 88 | 71 | |
| 172 | 314M USD | 88 | 56 | |
| 173 | 9.0B USD | 87 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score