Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IMNM · against 379 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #45 of 380 · scores higher than 88% of peers · safety percentile 88
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)35 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including IMNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IMNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 361 reported | 0.01× | 0.22× | 90% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 363 reported | 2.56 | 0.58 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 367 reported | 15.08× | 2.80× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.8B USD | 99 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 41 | 1.8B USD | 90 | 30 | |
| 42 | 1.9B USD | 89 | 49 | |
| 43 | 11.3B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 44 | 2.21T KRW (≈$1.6B) | 89 | 57 | |
| 45 | 2.4B USD | 88 | 27 | |
| 46 | 22.7B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 87 | 75 | |
| 47 | 25.3B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 87 | 68 | |
| 48 | 3.9B USD | 87 | 47 | |
| 49 | 2.2B USD | 86 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score