Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IIM · against 147 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #98 of 148 · scores higher than 34% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including IIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 123 reported | 0.51× | 0.56× | 54% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 141 reported | 0.77 | 0.60 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 143 reported | 0.92× | 2.17× | 18% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 466M AUD (≈$308M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 94 | 371M USD | 44 | ||
| 95 | 476M USD | 43 | ||
| 96 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 42 | 64 | |
| 97 | 1.0B USD | 42 | 48 | |
| 98 | 528M USD | 41 | ||
| 99 | 709M USD | 41 | 32 | |
| 100 | 499M USD | 40 | ||
| 101 | 455M USD | 40 | ||
| 102 | 3.8B SEK (≈$376M) | 39 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score