Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to i3 Verticals, Inc.
How i3 Verticals, Inc. stacks up
IIIV · against 607 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #249 of 608 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score56 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including IIIV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.9% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IIIV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IIIV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 591 reported | 1.6% | 1.7% | 49% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 622 reported | 3.4% | 3.9% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 175 reported | 6.6% | 2.0% | 75% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 599 reported | 84.8% | 40.9% | 85% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IIIV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 98 | 61 | |
| 249 | 56.5B JPY (≈$384M) | 57 | 80 | |
| 249 | 5.4B CNY (≈$761M) | 57 | 56 | |
| 249 | 791M USD | 57 | 64 | |
| 249 | 317M EUR (≈$349M) | 57 | 38 | |
| 249 | 631M USD | 57 | 42 | |
| 249 | 702M USD | 57 | 55 | |
| 249 | 854M USD | 57 | 74 | |
| 259 | 4.6B CNY (≈$647M) | 56 | 63 | |
| 259 | 1.1B USD | 56 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score