Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IHS Holding Limited
How IHS Holding Limited stacks up
IHS · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
72/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #61 of 180 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including IHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 72?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 79% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -6.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 3.6% | 5.9% | 37% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | Not reported | 13.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | -6.9% | 4.8% | 9% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 55 | 100.1B USD | 73 | 44 | |
| 55 | 1.8B USD | 73 | 69 | |
| 55 | Unavailable | 73 | ||
| 55 | 3.3B USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 61 | 2.9B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 61 | 17.2B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 63 | 12.7B USD | 71 | 47 | |
| 64 | 468M USD | 70 | 50 | |
| 65 | 7.5B USD | 68 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score