Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to iHeartMedia, Inc.
How iHeartMedia, Inc. stacks up
IHRT · against 102 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #53 of 103 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IHRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -86.7% vs peer median 2.9%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 8.6%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.0% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IHRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IHRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | -87.1% | 0.3% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 107 reported | 9.3% | 8.0% | 58% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 37 reported | 11.2% | 8.5% | 61% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | -607.1% | 64.7% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IHRT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 439.6B CLP (≈$484M) | 96 | 68 | |
| 4 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 49 | 303M USD | 47 | 34 | |
| 50 | 325M USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 51 | 882M AUD (≈$582M) | 43 | 39 | |
| 52 | 286M CAD (≈$209M) | 37 | 52 | |
| 53 | 324M USD | 34 | 25 | |
| 54 | 828M CAD (≈$605M) | 33 | 35 | |
| 54 | 2.5B SEK (≈$251M) | 33 | 30 | |
| 56 | 2.5B CNY (≈$352M) | 32 | 48 | |
| 57 | 286M USD | 31 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score