Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
How InterContinental Hotels Group PLC stacks up
IHG · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #274 of 356 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score36 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including IHG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 88% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IHG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IHG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 2.8% | 4.3% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 0.8% | 8.4% | 10% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | Not reported | 5.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | -1.9% | 35.8% | 12% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IHG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 271 | 6.7B USD | 26 | 52 | |
| 271 | 787M USD | 26 | 16 | |
| 271 | 12.2B USD | 26 | 63 | |
| 274 | 1.2B USD | 25 | 19 | |
| 274 | 24.9B USD | 25 | 49 | |
| 276 | 5.0B USD | 24 | 43 | |
| 276 | 3.5B USD | 24 | 41 | |
| 276 | 3.0B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 276 | 4.4B USD | 24 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score