Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IEX · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,449 of 2,394 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score240 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | IEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 2.9% | 3.8% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 5.2% | 7.0% | 37% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 3.7% | 3.7% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 22.8% | 50.5% | 21% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,449 | 6.7B AUD (≈$4.4B) | 39 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1,449 | 26.6B USD | 39 | 55 |
| 1,449 | 320M EUR (≈$352M) | 39 | 65 |
| 1,449 | 5.2B SEK (≈$523M) | 39 | 67 |
| 1,449 | 17.5B USD | 39 | 60 |
| 1,449 | 32.8B USD | 39 | 56 |
| 1,449 | 5.43T INR (≈$65.2B) | 39 | 55 |
| 1,449 | 1.4B AUD (≈$913M) | 39 | 26 |
| 1,449 | 1.5B USD | 39 | 61 |