Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IDXX · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,062 of 1,373 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including IDXX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IDXX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.68× | 0.24× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.55 | 0.53 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 1.17× | 2.62× | 15% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,058 | 3.9B CNY (≈$543M) | 23 | 48 | |
| 1,059 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 460M SGD (≈$350M) |
| 23 |
| 46 |
| 1,060 | 8.2B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 23 | 50 |
| 1,061 | 133.4B BRL (≈$24.0B) | 23 | 49 |
| 1,062 | 52.9B USD | 23 | 57 |
| 1,063 | 1.2B USD | 23 | 42 |
| 1,064 | 11.6B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 23 | 36 |
| 1,065 | 4.8B USD | 22 | 52 |
| 1,066 | 21.7B EUR (≈$23.9B) | 22 | 47 |