Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to IDACORP, Inc.
How IDACORP, Inc. stacks up
IDA · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #207 of 352 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including IDA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 67% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.7% vs peer median 2.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.4% vs peer median 2.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.1% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IDA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IDA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | -1.7% | 2.5% | 33% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 3.1% | 1.6% | 54% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | 1.4% | 2.0% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IDA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 203 | 7.6B USD | 42 | 46 | |
| 203 | 1.5B CAD (≈$1.1B) | 42 | 45 | |
| 207 | 4.7B CNY (≈$659M) | 41 | 67 | |
| 207 | 100.3B JPY (≈$682M) | 41 | 40 | |
| 207 | 8.4B USD | 41 | 43 | |
| 210 | 4.4B CNY (≈$618M) | 40 | 36 | |
| 210 | 131.1B THB (≈$3.7B) | 40 | 38 | |
| 210 | 502M USD | 40 | 42 | |
| 210 | 75.6B INR (≈$907M) | 40 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score