Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
How Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. stacks up
ICE · against 19 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #11 of 20 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including ICE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 7.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 11.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 37.1% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ICE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ICE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 20 reported | 6.9% | 10.7% | 32% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 20 reported | 37.1% | 20.7% | 79% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 19 reported | 11.9% | 11.9% | 56% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ICE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88.7B USD | 84 | 39 | |
| 2 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 75 | 60 | |
| 3 | 81.4B USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 4 | 6.04T INR (≈$72.4B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 5 | 43.6B GBP (≈$56.7B) | 69 | 48 | |
| 6 | 87.2B USD | 67 | 49 | |
| 8 | 70.0B USD | 65 | 53 | |
| 8 | 141.3B USD | 65 | 52 | |
| 10 | 90.7B USD | 63 | 33 | |
| 11 | 96.0B USD | 62 | 48 | |
| 11 | 59.8B USD | 62 | 46 | |
| 13 | 188.7B USD | 61 | 45 | |
| 14 | 137.4B USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 15 | 49.8B USD | 52 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score