Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
How Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. stacks up
ICE · against 131 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #79 of 132 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ICE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 5.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ICE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ICE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | 4.1% | 4.8% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 5.8% | 6.9% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 4.8% | 5.6% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 187 reported | 30.8% | 63.8% | 30% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ICE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 75 | 674M USD | 41 | 53 | |
| 75 | 12.7B USD | 41 | 63 | |
| 77 | 16.4B USD | 39 | 54 | |
| 77 | 3.0B USD | 39 | 52 | |
| 79 | 96.0B USD | 38 | 48 | |
| 79 | 11.7B USD | 38 | 33 | |
| 81 | 14.1B USD | 37 | 57 | |
| 81 | 4.1B USD | 37 | 64 | |
| 83 | 336M USD | 35 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score