Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
IBTA · against 535 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #191 of 536 · scores higher than 64% of peers · safety percentile 68
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)56 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including IBTA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | IBTA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 517 reported | 0.10× | 0.21× | 67% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 515 reported | -0.28 | 0.77 | 100% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 530 reported | 1.71× | 1.88× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 187 | 15.9B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 68 | 54 | |
| 188 | 18.1B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 68 | 59 | |
| 189 | 818M USD | 68 | 65 | |
| 190 | 60.8B TWD (≈$1.9B) | 68 | 67 | |
| 191 | 1.4B USD | 68 | 35 | |
| 192 | 1.8B USD | 67 | 86 | |
| 193 | 13.8B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 194 | 2.1B USD | 67 | 64 | |
| 195 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 67 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score