Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Installed Building Products, Inc.
How Installed Building Products, Inc. stacks up
IBP · against 271 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
89/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #41 of 272 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score36 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including IBP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 89?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 76% of peers. Operating margin: 12.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 87% of peers. Return on invested capital: 22.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 92% of peers. Return on assets: 11.1% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IBP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IBP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 258 reported | 22.2% | 10.1% | 83% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 272 reported | 12.4% | 9.1% | 68% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 257 reported | 11.1% | 4.4% | 88% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 244 reported | 38.5% | 12.1% | 89% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 274 reported | 33.6% | 31.4% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IBP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 39 | 7.4B USD | 90 | 64 | |
| 39 | 6.2B USD | 90 | 69 | |
| 41 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 69 | |
| 41 | 8.9B USD | 89 | 53 | |
| 41 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 47 | |
| 41 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 60 | |
| 45 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 88 | 65 | |
| 46 | 5.9B USD | 87 | 75 | |
| 46 | 4.0B USD | 87 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score