Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
How Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. stacks up
IAS · against 126 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 127 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including IAS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.5% vs peer median 8.6%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.7% vs peer median 2.9%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = IAS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | IAS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 2.7% | 2.6% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 6.5% | 8.0% | 42% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | Not reported | 8.6% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 126 reported | 64.0% | 46.9% | 63% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around IAS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 4 | 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) | 92 | 58 | |
| 5 | 29.5B ZAR (≈$1.6B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 72 | 17.2B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 41 | 60 | |
| 73 | 2.6B USD | 39 | 34 | |
| 74 | 24.7B CNY (≈$3.5B) | 38 | 43 | |
| 74 | 3.6B NZD (≈$2.1B) | 38 | 53 | |
| 76 | 1.7B USD | 37 | 54 | |
| 77 | 916M USD | 36 | 19 | |
| 77 | 2.3B USD | 36 | 33 | |
| 79 | 3.6B SGD (≈$2.8B) | 35 | 48 | |
| 79 | 2.9B USD | 35 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score