Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HURN · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #2,307 of 2,437 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including HURN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HURN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 2.25× | 0.41× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 0.09 | 0.61 | 93% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 1.71× | 1.62× | 54% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 2,303 | 5.3B CNY (≈$746M) | 6 | 42 | |
| 2,304 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.9B SEK (≈$194M) |
| 5 |
| 40 |
| 2,305 | 904M USD | 5 | 27 |
| 2,306 | 2.7B CNY (≈$380M) | 5 | 3 |
| 2,307 | 3.2B USD | 5 | 50 |
| 2,308 | 25.6B USD | 5 | 50 |
| 2,309 | 45.0B DKK (≈$6.8B) | 5 | 51 |
| 2,310 | 17.1B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 5 | 41 |
| 2,311 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 5 | 7 |