Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
How Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. stacks up
HTZ · against 962 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
24/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #681 of 963 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score111 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including HTZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 87% of peers. Return on assets: -1.2% vs peer median 3.1%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.9% vs peer median 7.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HTZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HTZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 929 reported | 3.1% | 5.6% | 36% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 961 reported | 7.9% | 6.9% | 56% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 925 reported | -1.2% | 2.5% | 15% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 916 reported | Not reported | 6.4% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 968 reported | 16.3% | 23.7% | 28% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HTZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 79.0B INR (≈$948M) | 100 | 81 | |
| 1 | 536M USD | 100 | 80 | |
| 4 | 173.6B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 19.4B TWD (≈$600M) | 99 | 68 | |
| 681 | 7.3B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 24 | 28 | |
| 681 | 1.1B USD | 24 | 32 | |
| 681 | 8.8B DKK (≈$1.3B) | 24 | 36 | |
| 681 | 1.2B USD | 24 | 36 | |
| 681 | 738M USD | 24 | 22 | |
| 681 | 370M EUR (≈$408M) | 24 | 41 | |
| 681 | 645M EUR (≈$710M) | 24 | 20 | |
| 693 | 4.6B CNY (≈$637M) | 23 | 17 | |
| 693 | 6.6B CNY (≈$918M) | 23 | 17 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score