Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HTFL · against 238 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #43 of 239 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 82
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including HTFL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HTFL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 231 reported | 0.10× | 0.24× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 236 reported | Not reported | 0.53 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 231 reported | 5.08× | 2.54× | 74% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2.6B USD | 100 | 43 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 99 | ||
| 5 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 100 | |
| 39 | 6.0B USD | 84 | ||
| 40 | 3.1B USD | 84 | 27 | |
| 41 | 21.6B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 83 | 70 | |
| 42 | 49.0B CNY (≈$6.9B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 43 | 4.7B USD | 82 | 46 | |
| 44 | 22.8B CNY (≈$3.2B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 45 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 80 | 90 | |
| 46 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 80 | 70 | |
| 47 | 32.3B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 80 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score