Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthStream, Inc.
How HealthStream, Inc. stacks up
HSTM · against 1,336 other Healthcare companies
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #609 of 1,337 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score133 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HSTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.3% vs peer median 1.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 4.0%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HSTM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HSTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,287 reported | 2.3% | 1.5% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,357 reported | 5.2% | 4.2% | 56% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 711 reported | 4.3% | -1.0% | 75% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,306 reported | 38.5% | 37.9% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HSTM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 3.5B HKD (≈$451M) | 99 | 51 | |
| 609 | 5.3B CNY (≈$738M) | 54 | 40 | |
| 609 | 6.7B CNY (≈$941M) | 54 | 52 | |
| 609 | 406M USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 609 | 5.8B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 609 | 969M USD | 54 | 54 | |
| 609 | 474M USD | 54 | 46 | |
| 609 | 356.9B USD | 54 | 37 | |
| 609 | 166.5B SEK (≈$16.6B) | 54 | 49 | |
| 609 | 16.1B CHF (≈$18.5B) | 54 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score