Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HealthEquity, Inc.
How HealthEquity, Inc. stacks up
HQY · against 588 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #144 of 589 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score57 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HQY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.6% vs peer median 4.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 1.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HQY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HQY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 577 reported | 2.7% | -4.3% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 5.6% | -0.8% | 73% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 553 reported | 5.2% | -2.3% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 23.5% | 25.9% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HQY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 256M USD | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 595M USD | 96 | 97 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 2 | 289M USD | 96 | 57 | |
| 2 | 810M USD | 96 | 69 | |
| 144 | 1.8B USD | 57 | 52 | |
| 144 | 2.9B USD | 57 | 50 | |
| 144 | 54.0B USD | 57 | 47 | |
| 144 | 31.3B USD | 57 | 63 | |
| 144 | 8.4B USD | 57 | 67 | |
| 151 | 3.0B USD | 56 | 35 | |
| 151 | 356M USD | 56 | 35 | |
| 153 | 1.6B USD | 55 | 51 | |
| 153 | 3.0B USD | 55 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score