Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HP Inc.
How HP Inc. stacks up
HPQ · against 143 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
40/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #115 of 144 · scores higher than 18% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including HPQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -3.8% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.1% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HPQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HPQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 144 reported | 8.1% | 13.8% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 127 reported | -3.8% | 22.0% | 17% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 143 reported | 2.7% | 8.6% | 28% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HPQ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 4 | 42.6B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 5 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 113 | 114.4B CNY (≈$16.0B) | 45 | 51 | |
| 114 | 1.59T INR (≈$19.0B) | 43 | 67 | |
| 115 | 323.5B CNY (≈$45.3B) | 40 | 70 | |
| 115 | 18.7B USD | 40 | 47 | |
| 115 | 25.5B USD | 40 | 56 | |
| 115 | 16.9B USD | 40 | 57 | |
| 119 | 28.8B USD | 39 | 70 | |
| 119 | 24.9B USD | 39 | 48 | |
| 121 | 646.8B TWD (≈$20.1B) | 37 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score