Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
How Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
HOV · against 624 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #264 of 625 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including HOV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield and EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 30.4% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HOV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HOV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 620 reported | 1.0% | 3.6% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 637 reported | 4.8% | 8.7% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 157 reported | 32.7% | 7.7% | 96% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 621 reported | 116.3% | 61.8% | 80% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HOV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 3 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 264 | 47.9B JPY (≈$326M) | 57 | 47 | |
| 264 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 57 | 55 | |
| 264 | 74.4B JPY (≈$506M) | 57 | 43 | |
| 264 | 327M USD | 57 | 51 | |
| 264 | 604M USD | 57 | 33 | |
| 272 | 96.8B JPY (≈$658M) | 56 | 60 | |
| 272 | 52.8B JPY (≈$359M) | 56 | 47 | |
| 272 | 936M NZD (≈$561M) | 56 | 57 | |
| 272 | 383M USD | 56 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score