Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HOV · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #103 of 362 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)33 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including HOV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HOV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 319 reported | 1.31× | 0.99× | 39% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 348 reported | 1.82 | 1.14 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 362 reported | 4.17× | 1.47× | 92% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 96 | 89 | |
| 2 | 499M USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 141M USD | 95 | 30 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 95 | 89 | |
| 5 | 283M USD | 94 | 48 | |
| 99 | 4.6B USD | 47 | 44 | |
| 100 | 3.3B USD | 47 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 101 | 18.3B USD | 46 | 55 |
| 102 | 13.0B USD | 46 | 68 |
| 103 | 604M USD | 46 | 33 |
| 104 | 2.1B USD | 45 | 25 |
| 105 | 846M USD | 45 | 60 |
| 106 | 473M USD | 45 | 62 |
| 107 | 2.0B USD | 44 | 46 |