Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HLNE · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #163 of 399 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including HLNE · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio and debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | HLNE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.22× | 0.57× | 68% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 1.25 | 0.67 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 4.11× | 2.04× | 69% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 159 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 60 | 66 | |
| 160 | 6.04T INR (≈$72.4B) | 60 | 60 | |
| 161 | 16.4B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 162 | 461M USD | 60 | 59 | |
| 163 | 5.9B USD | 59 | 69 | |
| 164 | 203M EUR (≈$224M) | 59 | 52 | |
| 165 | 90.9B JPY (≈$618M) | 59 | 70 | |
| 166 | 481M USD | 59 | ||
| 167 | 843M USD | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score