Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.
How Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. stacks up
HGV · against 333 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #284 of 334 · scores higher than 14% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score27 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including HGV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on assets: 1.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 68% of peers. Return on invested capital: 3.3% vs peer median 7.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 63% of peers. Operating margin: 4.5% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HGV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HGV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 316 reported | 3.3% | 9.6% | 17% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 334 reported | 4.5% | 8.7% | 22% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 315 reported | 1.2% | 4.4% | 16% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 302 reported | 11.5% | 11.7% | 49% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 337 reported | 24.6% | 30.5% | 40% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HGV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 393.5B INR (≈$4.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 278 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 30 | 33 | |
| 278 | 4.1B USD | 30 | 34 | |
| 284 | 3.51T KRW (≈$2.5B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 284 | 681.8B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 284 | 3.2B USD | 29 | 46 | |
| 284 | 4.0B USD | 29 | 36 | |
| 288 | 2.7B USD | 28 | 43 | |
| 288 | 26.5B SEK (≈$2.6B) | 28 | 24 | |
| 288 | 2.0B USD | 28 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score