Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HD · against 6 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #3 of 7 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score5 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including HD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | HD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 4.3% | 4.7% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 6.3% | 6.5% | 33% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 5 reported | 4.5% | -2.9% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 6 reported | 5.0% | 22.3% | 20% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.25T BRL (≈$225.8B) | 57 | 50 | |
| 2 | 197.9B EUR (≈$217.7B) | 52 | 53 | |
| 3 | 332.9B USD | 38 | 45 | |
| 4 | 186.1B USD | 37 | 49 | |
| 5 | 228.5B USD | 34 | 40 | |
| 6 | 174.8B EUR (≈$192.3B) | 32 | 56 | |
| 7 | 249.7B USD | 31 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score