Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
HBCP · against 220 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #84 of 221 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score28 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HBCP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and book yield, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | HBCP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 220 reported | 9.7% | 8.6% | 64% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | Not reported | 10.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 10.7% | 7.6% | 74% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 222 reported | 93.9% | 90.4% | 52% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B HKD (≈$428M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 20.6B TWD (≈$638M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.4B HKD (≈$429M) | 98 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.00T IDR (≈$744M) | 98 | 64 | |
| 83 | 541M USD | 70 | 43 | |
| 84 | 822M AUD (≈$543M) | 69 | ||
| 84 | 590M USD | 69 | 61 | |
| 84 | 768M USD | 69 | 73 | |
| 84 | 483M USD | 69 | 55 | |
| 84 | 385M USD | 69 | 46 | |
| 84 | 430M USD | 69 | 63 | |
| 84 | 5.7B NOK (≈$538M) | 69 | ||
| 91 | 472M USD | 68 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score