Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COFS · against 917 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #272 of 918 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score92 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including COFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | COFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 928 reported | 10.1% | 8.1% | 71% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | Not reported | 10.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 507 reported | 9.4% | 8.1% | 59% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 914 reported | 86.9% | 78.2% | 58% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.3B HKD (≈$428M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 272 | 49.0B SAR (≈$13.2B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 272 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 403.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) |
| 70 |
| 62 |
| 272 | 144.0B JPY (≈$979M) | 70 | 49 |
| 272 | 6.5B USD | 70 | 66 |
| 272 | 541M USD | 70 | 43 |
| 272 | 6.4B USD | 70 | 60 |
| 272 | 264.4B MXN (≈$14.3B) | 70 | 53 |
| 272 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 70 | 57 |
| 272 | 619.9B INR (≈$7.4B) | 70 | 71 |