Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hayward Holdings, Inc.
How Hayward Holdings, Inc. stacks up
HAYW · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #205 of 446 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including HAYW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 26.5% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAYW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAYW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 7.8% | 8.4% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 26.5% | 9.2% | 69% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 5.4% | 5.2% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAYW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 203 | 1.2B USD | 63 | 31 | |
| 205 | 9.9B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 205 | 3.9B USD | 62 | 71 | |
| 205 | 2.4B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 205 | 3.5B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 205 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 205 | 270M USD | 62 | 41 | |
| 205 | 4.0B USD | 62 | 69 | |
| 212 | 850M USD | 61 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score