Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to HawkEye 360, Inc.
How HawkEye 360, Inc. stacks up
HAWK · against 2,439 other Industrials companies
Profitability
5/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #2,306 of 2,440 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score232 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including HAWK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 94% of peers. Return on invested capital: -10.0% vs peer median 7.1%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 93% of peers. Operating margin: -10.9% vs peer median 7.7%
- Return on assets is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAWK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAWK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2,323 reported | -10.0% | 7.1% | 6% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 2,434 reported | -10.9% | 7.7% | 7% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 2,336 reported | Not reported | 3.1% | — | — | 33% |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 2,300 reported | Not reported | 8.0% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 2,460 reported | 74.5% | 25.8% | 98% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAWK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14.9B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 5.5B CNY (≈$769M) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 13.8B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 89 | |
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 51M MYR (≈$11M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2,306 | 1.8B CNY (≈$245M) | 5 | 3 | |
| 2,306 | 1.9B AUD (≈$1.2B) | 5 | 34 | |
| 2,306 | 59M USD | 5 | 15 | |
| 2,306 | 3.4B USD | 5 | 16 | |
| 2,306 | 1.4B USD | 5 | 38 | |
| 2,306 | 914M SEK (≈$91M) | 5 | 33 | |
| 2,306 | 506M USD | 5 | 29 | |
| 2,306 | 1.4B USD | 5 | 14 | |
| 2,331 | 1.5B CNY (≈$210M) | 4 | 1 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score