Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Halliburton Company
How Halliburton Company stacks up
HAL · against 43 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #25 of 44 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including HAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -12.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.6% vs peer median 0.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.1% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 44 reported | 0.6% | -0.2% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 41 reported | -12.0% | 2.9% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 44 reported | -0.1% | -3.5% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 20.1B USD | 91 | 65 | |
| 21 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 50 | 56 | |
| 22 | 904.0B TWD (≈$28.0B) | 49 | 63 | |
| 23 | 16.7B USD | 48 | 70 | |
| 24 | 29.1B USD | 42 | 58 | |
| 25 | 28.4B USD | 41 | 48 | |
| 26 | 3.73T JPY (≈$25.4B) | 38 | 63 | |
| 27 | 56.7B USD | 34 | 57 | |
| 27 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 34 | 59 | |
| 29 | 28.7B USD | 33 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score