Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hafnia Limited
How Hafnia Limited stacks up
HAFN · against 444 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #146 of 445 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score68 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including HAFN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 84% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = HAFN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | HAFN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 437 reported | 12.5% | 4.3% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 12.6% | 7.9% | 83% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 199 reported | 10.5% | 4.2% | 91% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 437 reported | 51.0% | 40.2% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around HAFN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 146 | 2.9B CHF (≈$3.4B) | 65 | 56 | |
| 146 | 6.4B CHF (≈$7.4B) | 65 | 63 | |
| 146 | 6.6B USD | 65 | 58 | |
| 146 | 5.1B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 146 | 5.6B USD | 65 | 50 | |
| 146 | 6.9B NZD (≈$4.1B) | 65 | 54 | |
| 146 | 9.3B USD | 65 | 47 | |
| 146 | 2.9B USD | 65 | 48 | |
| 146 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score