Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Hyatt Hotels Corporation
How Hyatt Hotels Corporation stacks up
H · against 129 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #119 of 130 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including H · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -81.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.2% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = H, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | H | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 130 reported | 5.8% | 8.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 115 reported | -81.9% | 10.5% | 4% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 129 reported | 3.2% | 9.8% | 24% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around H| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 116 | 13.8B USD | 30 | 66 | |
| 117 | 283.2B SEK (≈$28.3B) | 27 | 41 | |
| 118 | 1.82T JPY (≈$12.4B) | 26 | 57 | |
| 119 | 17.1B USD | 24 | 32 | |
| 119 | 17.5B USD | 24 | 18 | |
| 121 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 23 | 53 | |
| 122 | 9.8B USD | 22 | 47 | |
| 123 | 24.2B USD | 18 | 66 | |
| 124 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 16 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score