Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GXO Logistics, Inc.
How GXO Logistics, Inc. stacks up
GXO · against 433 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #233 of 434 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GXO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 9.7% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GXO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GXO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 424 reported | 2.2% | 4.3% | 19% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 437 reported | 8.3% | 7.9% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 197 reported | 3.0% | 4.1% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 423 reported | 50.0% | 39.8% | 64% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GXO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 223 | 7.6B EUR (≈$8.3B) | 53 | 37 | |
| 233 | 50.3B CNY (≈$7.0B) | 52 | 73 | |
| 233 | 4.9B USD | 52 | 78 | |
| 233 | 31.8B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 52 | 45 | |
| 233 | 6.0B USD | 52 | 43 | |
| 233 | 290.4B THB (≈$8.1B) | 52 | 46 | |
| 238 | 483.7B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 51 | 47 | |
| 238 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 51 | 41 | |
| 238 | 5.9B USD | 51 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score