Ranked #1,491 of 1,585 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
159 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including GTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 6 among Consumer Cyclical companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
▼Shareholders' equity is negative, so debt/equity counts as among the highest in its peer group. Debt / equity: — vs peer median 0.46×
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 77% of peers. Current ratio: 1.00× vs peer median 1.48×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 68% of peers. Beta: 0.84 vs peer median 0.63
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GTX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
GTX
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported
Not reported
0.50×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported
0.84
0.56
32%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported
1.00×
1.48×
23%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
