Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Garrett Motion Inc.
How Garrett Motion Inc. stacks up
GTX · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
58/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #180 of 356 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including GTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth and revenue growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.6% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 28.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GTX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 8.5% | 5.9% | 61% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 28.2% | 6.2% | 69% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -0.6% | 4.1% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GTX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 175 | 19.7B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 175 | 6.8B USD | 59 | 49 | |
| 175 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 33 | |
| 175 | 489M USD | 59 | 54 | |
| 180 | 3.9B USD | 58 | 59 | |
| 180 | 3.0B USD | 58 | 60 | |
| 182 | 27.4B USD | 57 | 23 | |
| 182 | 364M USD | 57 | 44 | |
| 182 | 5.5B USD | 57 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score