Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.
How ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. stacks up
GTM · against 570 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #293 of 571 · scores higher than 48% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score56 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GTM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -43.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -15.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 98% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 29.0% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GTM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GTM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 563 reported | -43.2% | 2.1% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 13.0% | 4.4% | 91% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 194 reported | 28.8% | 2.8% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 567 reported | 66.9% | 34.8% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GTM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 4 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 4 | 69.0B TWD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 293 | 11.9B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 47 | 33 | |
| 293 | 714M USD | 47 | 21 | |
| 293 | 1.8B USD | 47 | 24 | |
| 293 | 686M USD | 47 | 21 | |
| 293 | 1.2B USD | 47 | 21 | |
| 300 | 16.8B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 46 | 47 | |
| 300 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 46 | 63 | |
| 300 | 24.7B SEK (≈$2.5B) | 46 | 56 | |
| 300 | 9.9B SEK (≈$985M) | 46 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score