Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GTLB · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #655 of 1,698 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 61
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including GTLB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GTLB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | Not reported | 0.26× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.99 | 0.84 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.41× | 1.83× | 67% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 651 | 160.0B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 62 | 56 | |
| 652 | 1.02T KRW (≈$733M) | 62 | 41 | |
| 653 | 2.1B USD | 62 | 43 | |
| 654 | 312M ILS (≈$84M) | 62 | 60 | |
| 655 | 8.7B USD | 61 | 43 | |
| 656 | 4.0B CNY (≈$566M) | 61 | 36 | |
| 657 | 4.0B CNY (≈$562M) | 61 | 31 | |
| 658 | 2.3B USD | 61 | 64 | |
| 659 | 56.3B JPY (≈$383M) | 61 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score