Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GTLB · against 250 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #71 of 251 · scores higher than 72% of peers · safety percentile 61
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including GTLB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GTLB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 242 reported | Not reported | 0.33× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 238 reported | 0.99 | 1.00 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 250 reported | 2.41× | 1.67× | 72% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 67 | 40.2B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 64 | 43 | |
| 68 | 76.3B CNY (≈$10.7B) | 63 | 61 | |
| 69 | 11.3B USD | 62 | 68 | |
| 70 | 46.1B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 62 | 59 | |
| 71 | 8.7B USD | 61 | 43 | |
| 72 | 9.5B USD | 61 | 68 | |
| 73 | 7.3B USD | 61 | 68 | |
| 74 | 12.9B USD | 60 | 47 | |
| 75 | 986.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score