Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd.
How Gates Industrial Corporation Ltd. stacks up
GTES · against 431 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #148 of 432 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GTES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 9.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GTES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GTES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 422 reported | 5.7% | 4.2% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 435 reported | 9.1% | 7.8% | 62% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | 6.1% | 4.0% | 72% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 421 reported | 56.6% | 38.1% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GTES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 3 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 9.3B SGD (≈$7.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 135 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 62 | |
| 148 | 146.6B TWD (≈$4.5B) | 64 | 51 | |
| 148 | 734.2B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 64 | 61 | |
| 148 | 1.61T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 64 | 61 | |
| 148 | 6.2B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 148 | 12.0B USD | 64 | 53 | |
| 148 | 6.6B USD | 64 | 52 | |
| 154 | 26.6B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 63 | 62 | |
| 154 | 8.3B USD | 63 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score